Literature

@article{Raatikainen2019,
title = {Software product lines and variability modeling: A tertiary study},
author = {Mikko Raatikainen and Juha Tiihonen and Tomi M\"{a}nnist\"{o} },
doi = {10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.027},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
journal = {Journal of Systems and Software Volume 149},
volume = {149},
pages = {485-510},
keywords = {Software product lines, variability modeling},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{BENAVIDES2010615,
title = {Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review Information Systems},
author = {David Benavides and Sergio Segura and Antonio Ruiz-Cort\'{e}s},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437910000025},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2010.01.001},
issn = {0306-4379},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Information Systems},
volume = {35},
number = {6},
pages = {615 - 636},
keywords = {Automated analyses, Feature models, Literature review, Software product lines},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Schobbens:2007:GSF:1219184.1219634,
title = {Generic Semantics of Feature Diagrams},
author = {Pierre-Yves Schobbens and Patrick Heymans and Jean-Christophe Trigaux and Yves Bontemps},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.08.008},
doi = {10.1016/j.comnet.2006.08.008},
issn = {1389-1286},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {Comput. Netw.},
volume = {51},
number = {2},
pages = {456--479},
publisher = {Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
keywords = {Feature diagram, Feature interaction, Formal semantics, Software product lines, Survey},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{doi:10.1002/spip.213b,
title = {Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization},
author = {Czarnecki Krzysztof and Helsen Simon and Eisenecker Ulrich},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/spip.213},
doi = {10.1002/spip.213},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-03-09},
journal = {Software Process: Improvement and Practice},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {7-29},
abstract = {Abstract Feature modeling is an important approach to capture the commonalities and variabilities in system families and product lines. Cardinality-based feature modeling integrates a number of existing extensions of the original feature-modeling notation from Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis. Staged configuration is a process that allows the incremental configuration of cardinality-based feature models. It can be achieved by performing a step-wise specialization of the feature model. In this article, we argue that cardinality-based feature models can be interpreted as a special class of context-free grammars. We make this precise by specifying a translation from a feature model into a context-free grammar. Consequently, we provide a semantic interpretation for cardinality-based feature models by assigning an appropriate semantics to the language recognized by the corresponding grammar. Finally, we give an account on how feature model specialization can be formalized as transformations on the grammar equivalent of feature models. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.},
keywords = {domain analysis, software configuration, Software product lines, system families},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}